Soil biotic activity and oil pollution

Main Article Content

F. R. de la Garza

Abstract

Nowadays soils pollution is one of the most important ecological problems, this one can concern the characteristics of soil. Biological tests, as the enzimatic activity and ATP's production, can serve to characterize the composition and the functioning of edaphic biota, they are an important tool to study the impact of the agents pollutants in the soil. The effect of refinery sludge on the biological activity of soils located in the region Cartagena – La Union of Cartagena, SE Spain was evaluated. From an area that has received refinery sludge, three sites were chosen for soil sampling; the sampling included intact soil. Edaphic respiration, enzymatic activity (Urease and Phosphatase), ATP's production and fitotoxicidad were evaluated; besides soil physical-chemical analysis. Results indicate that ATP's production was major in the soil with more pollution since the presence of hydrocarbons stimulates soil microbial populations, this fact repeated itself in case of the activity of the urease and phosphatase, and the values of these were major in the soils with more refinery sludge in comparison with the not contaminated soils. The germination of the seeds diminished of 100 % in the intact soil to 39.6 % of the most contaminated soil. Hydrocarbons soil pollution affect significantly (P>0.005) soil pH; the electrical conductivity increased 5.6 times with relation to not contaminated soil; due to the contribution that they do, the compounds included in the refinery mud observation included the content of total Zn that increased in soil with refinery sludge by 3 fold in relation with the intact soil; the variation in the contents of total Cu was of 69.57 mg of the soil most contaminated with regard to the intact soil. As a conclusion hydrocarbons soil pollution in the shape of refinery sludge, impact physical and chemical aspects as well the biological aspects of the soil, which - with the exception of the germination of seeds - were stimulated by this type of pollution.

Article Details

How to Cite
de la Garza, F. R. (2008). Soil biotic activity and oil pollution. Revista Latinoamericana De Recursos Naturales, 4(2), 49-54. Retrieved from https://revista.itson.edu.mx/index.php/rlrn/article/view/102
Section
Original Article

References

Abaye, D.A. and C. Brookes. 2006. Relative importance of substrate type and previous soil management in synthesis of microbial biomass and substrate mineralization. European Journal of Soil Science 2006; 57: 179 – 189.
Atlas, R.M. 1988. Microbiology and Fundamentals. McMillansPublishing Co., New York, USA. 352 – 353.
Barajas Aceves M., C. Grace, J. Ansorena , L. Dendooven, P.C. Brookes. 1999. Soil microbial biomass and organic C in a gradient of zinc concentrations in soils around a mine spoil tip. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 31, 867–876.
Bower CA, Wilcox LV. 1965. Soluble salts. In: Black CA, editor. Methods of soils analysis: Part 2. Madison (WI, USA): American Society of Agronomy, 933–40.
Ciardi, C., Nannipieri, P. 1990. A comparison of methods for measuring ATP in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 22, 725 – 727.
Conesa, H. M., A. Faz, R. Arnaldos. 2006. Heavy metal accumulation and tolerance in plants from mine tailings of the semiarid Cartagena–La Unión mining district (SE Spain). Science of the Total Environment; 1 – 11.
Diack, M. and D.E. Stott. 2001. Development of soil quality index for the Chalmers silty clay loam form the Midwest USA. In: D.E. Stott, R.H. Mohtar and G.C. Steinhardt (eds). The Global Farm. 10th. International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting; 550 – 555
Ernst, W.H.O. 1996. Bioavailability of heavy metals and decontamination of soils by plants. Applied Geochemistry 11,163 – 167.
García, I. C., F. Gil, T. Hernández y M. Muñoz. In: García, I. C., F. Gil, T. Hernández y C. Trasar, editores. 2003. Técnicas de Análisis de Parámetros Bioquímicos en Suelos: Medida de Actividades Enzimáticas y Biomasa Microbiana. Ediciones Mundi-Prensa. España, 287 – 288.
Insam, H., Hutchinson, T.C., Reber, H.H., 1996. Effects of heavy metal stress on the metabolic quotient of the soil microflora. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 28, 691–694.
Kuperman, R.G., Margaret, M.C. 1997. Soils heavy metals concentrations: microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a contaminated grassland ecosystem. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 29, 179–190.
Lindsay W, Novell W. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for Zn, Fe, Mn, and Cu. Soil Science Society America Journal 42: 421-428.
Marín, J.A., T. Hernández, C. García. 2005. Bioremediation of oil refinery sludge by landfarming in semiarid conditions: Influence on soil microbial activity. Envirometal Research 98: 185 195.
Martínez-Orozco JM, Valero-Huete F, González-Alonso S. 1993. Environmental problems and proposals to reclaim the areas affected by mining exploitations in the Cartagena mountains (southeast Spain). Landsc Urban Plan; 23:195–207.
Molina, B. L., L. Vega L., M. Guerrero, S. Ramírez, I. Romero, C. Vega J., A. Albores. 2005. Ecotoxicological Evlaluation of Diesel-Contaminated Soil Befote and After Bioeremediation Process. Wiley InterScience; 100 – 109.
Mulligan, C.N., R.N Yong and B.F. Gibbs. 2001. Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: an evaluation. Engineering Geology 60:193-207.
Nannipieri, P., Jhonson, R.L., Paul, E.A. 1978. Criteria for measurament of micorbial growth and activity in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemestry 10, 223 – 229.
National Soil Survey Center Soil survey laboratory methods manual. 1966. Soil Survey Investigations Report, No 42, version 3.0. United States Department of Agriculture. Natural resources Conservation Service. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington DC. EE.UU. 693 pp.
Nilsson, K.S., R. Hyvönen & G.I. Agren. 2005. Using continuos-quality theory to predict microbial biomass and soil organic carbon following organic amendments. European Journal of Soil Science 56: 397 – 405.
Olivares, S. E. 1994. Paquete de diseños experimentales FAUANL. Versión 2.5. Facultad de Agronomía UANL. Marín, N. L.
Peech M. 1965. Hydrogenion activity. In: Black CA, editor. Methods of soils analysis: part 2. Madison (WI, USA): American Society of Agronomy; 914–26.
Stamatiadis, S. J.W. Doran, T. Kettler. 1999. Field and laboratory evaluation of soil quality changes resulting from injection of liquid sewage sludge. Applied Soil Ecology 12: 263 – 272.
Suhadolc M., R. Schroll, A. Gattinger, M. Schloter, J.C. Munch, D. Lestan. 2004. Effects of modified Pb-, Zn-, and Cd- availability on the microbial communities and on the degradation of isoproturon in a heavy metal contaminated soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 36: 1943–1954.
Tabatabai, M.A. Bremner, J.M. 1969. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assy of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biology & Biochemestry 1, 301 – 307.
Tabatabai, M.A. Bremner, J.M. 1972. Assay of urease activity in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemestry 4, 479 - 487.
Webster, J., Hampton, G., Leach, F. 1984. ATP in soil: a new extractant and extraction procedure. Soil Biology & Biochemestry 16, 335 – 342.