Chemical, microbiological and antimicrobial resistance changes in vermicomposts of pig manure by the effect of the initial carbon:nitrogen ratio
Main Article Content
Abstract
Vermicomposting is a helpful alternative to recover nutrients and reduce pathogenic bacteria from animal manure; however, the optimal initial carbon: nitrogen ratio (CNR) to maximize the nutritional value and minimize the microbial load and antimicrobial resistance factors (AMR) of the final product is unknown. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of the initial CNR (15, 31, 46, and 70) of the pre-composting of vermicompost prepared with swine manure on the changes over time in nutrient content, total aerobic bacteria (TAB), coliforms, fungi and yeasts and AMR factors in E. coli. Samples were taken for chemical (days 1, 28, and 140) and microbiological analysis (days 1, 7, 28, 56, 84, and 140), and the presence of AMR (days 1 and 140). Data were analyzed using a mixed model with repeated observations over time and by linear regression analysis. Organic matter, organic carbon, N-NH4+, and CNR decreased and total nitrogen increased with time (P < 0.01). TAB, coliform, fungi, and yeast counts showed decreasing cubic responses with time and were comparable at 140 days among vermicompost with different initial CNR (P < 0.01). E. coli was isolated from 10 initial manure samples; the relative frequency and percentage of E. coli isolates with AMR were highest for ampicillin and carbenicillin (7/10, 70%) and intermediate for cephalothin and chloramphenicol (4/10, 40%) and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (3/10, 30%). Five E. coli isolates were shown to be multiresistant to antibiotics (MMR). Although no E. coli was isolated from the final vermicompost, the bacteria Acinetobacter anitratus was found in three (3/12) samples and was also found to be MMR. In conclusion, regardless of the initial CNR, vermicomposts with high nutritional value were obtained, with a lower load of potentially pathogenic bacteria and free of E. coli carrying AMR. However, prior to its use as organic fertilizer, the presence of AMR factors in other bacteria should be evaluated to reduce the risks of their spread through soil and water, and of human infections.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Aira, M., Gómez-Brandón, M., González-Porto, P. and Domínguez, J., 2011. Selective reduction of the pathogenic load of cow manure in an industrial-scale continuousfeeding vermireactor. Bioresource Technology 102: 9633–9637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.115
Arancon, N.Q., Edwards, C.A., Lee, S. and Byrne, R., 2006. Effects of humic acids from vermicomposts on plant growth. Eurasian Journal of Soil Biology 42: S65-S69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.06.004
Atanda, A.C., Adeleke, R.A., Jooste, P.J. and Madoroba, E., 2018. Insights into the Microbiological Safety of Vermicompost and Vermicompost Tea Produced by South African Smallholder Farmers. Indian Journal of Microbiology 58: 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-018-0748-7
Atiyeh, R.M., Arancon, N., Edwards, C.A. and Metzger, J.D., 2000. Influence of earthworm-processed pig manure on the growth and yield of greenhouse tomatoes. Bioresource
Technology 75: 175-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00064-X
Atiyeh, R.M., Edwards, C.A., Subler, S. and Metzger, J.D., 2001. Pig manure vermicompost as a component of a horticultural bedding plant medium: effects on physicochemical properties and plant growth. Bioresource Technology 78: 1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00172-3 Bauer, A.W., Kirby, W.M., Sherris, J.C. and Turck, M., 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 45: 493–496. https://doi:10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493
Bernal, M.P., Alburquerque, J.A. and Moral, R., 2009. Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review. Bioresource
Technology 100: 5444–5453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.027
Cao, R., Ben, W., Qiang, Z. and Zhang, J., 2020. Removal of antibiotic resistance genes in pig manure composting influenced by inoculation of compound microbial agents.
Bioresource Technology 317: 123966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biortech.2020.123966 de Bertoldi, M., Vallini, G. and Pera, A., 1983. The biology of composting: a review. Waste Management Research 1: 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-242X(83)90055-1
Congilosi, J.L. and Aga, D.S., 2021. Review on the fate of antimicrobials, antimicrobial resistance genes, and other micropollutants in manure during enhanced anaerobic digestion and composting. Journal of Hazardous Materials 405: 123634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123634
Finstein, M.S., Miller, F.C., MacGregor, S.T. and Psarianos, K.M., 1985. The Rutgers strategy for composting: process design and control. EPA Project Summary, EPA 600/S2-
85/059, Cincinnati, Ohio. https://DOI:10.17660/ActaHortic.1992.302.7
Gómez, R.S., Angeles, M.L., Núnez, H.G. y Figueroa, V.U., 2013. Guía de buenas prácticas de manejo de excretas: Metodologías para la elaboración de compostas y lombricompostas de excretas de ganado de leche. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal, INIFAP-SAGARPA, México. Libro
Técnico 20: 1-52. http://biblioteca.inifap.gob.mx:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4126
Gómez, R.S., Angeles, M.L. y Becerra, J., 2011. Alternativas para el reciclaje de excretas animales. Uso de humus de lombriz y otros derivados de la lombricultura. Centro
Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal, INIFAP-SAGARPA, México. Publicación Técnica 14: 1-64.
Kämpfer, P., 2014. Acinetobacter. In: Batt, C.A. and Tortorello, M.L. Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, 1: 11-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384730-0.00002-1
Kyakuwaire, M., Olupot, G., Amoding, A., Nkedi-Kizza, P. and Basamba, T.A., 2019. How safe is chicken litter for land application as an organic fertilizer? A review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16: 3521. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193521